One fundamental fact about democracy almost goes without saying: Anyone who tries to rewrite any law should be identified. The public deserves such disclosure and citizens are owed such accountability.

In its second surprise move in a week, the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday, January 15, announced it would review another narrow dispute involving anti-gay activists’ alleged fear of harassment over their public opposition to legal recognition for same-sex relationships.

Putting aside, for a few days, its anticipated ruling that will expand “free speech” rights of corporate America, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken unto its bosom champions of discrimination who cry out that they face persecution.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge of Washington’s practice of releasing initiative and referendum petitions under the state’s voter-approved Public Records Act.

State Rep. Mike Armstrong has come up with what he thinks is another legitimate reason to keep secret the names of those who sign a statewide initiative or referendum: to protect law enforcement officers from physical harm.