I believe opponents of Referendum 71 have run a campaign of fear. They would have us believe that dire consequences will result if R-71 is approved, including gay marriage and the collapse of civilization. — Ann Shannon, Bellingham

A recent analysis by the New York Times (Your Money, October 3, 2009) showed that it’s more expensive to be a gay or lesbian couple than a heterosexual couple. The difference was mainly in the benefits that go with marriage – especially the cost of health insurance, estate taxes, pension benefits, IRAs, and Social Security benefits. — Judy Stilts, Bellingham

Referendum 71, a proposal to extend more legal protections to domestic partners in Washington State, has been nicknamed “everything but marriage.”

I am a 52-year-old gay male who has lived in Washington for the past 24 years. I’m a retired Army officer who fell in love with my partner back in 1985 while stationed at Fort Lewis. — Paul Britt, Tacoma

Washington state’s slow-but-steady approach to increasing rights and benefits to gay and lesbian couples hit its first snag just as the three-year process appeared to be complete.

Thurston County voters are hanging on to their ballots, but Auditor Kim Wyman is sticking with her prediction of 60 percent to 61 percent turnout in Tuesday’s vote-by-mail election.

On November 3 the nation will know the fate of the more than 6,000 registered same-sex domestic partnerships in Washington State.

Washington students voted in favor of Referendum 71’s gay-rights expansion and against Initiative 1033’s controls on government revenue growth in a mock election reported today by the Office of the Secretary of State.

This letter is addressed to those Washingtonians who, like me, are committed to living out their faith and support the rights of the nearly 12,000 registered domestic partners in our state. These are people who seek fair treatment and simply want the same legal protections so many others already enjoy. — Rev. Mark Dowdy, Senior Pastor, The United Churches of Olympia, Presbyterian (USA) and United Church of Christ

A warning: This article does not promote gay marriage. It remains a mystery what person and under whose instruction placed a stack of what the Protect Marriage Washington campaign calls its doorbell flier pamphlets, in the lobby of Coughlin Hall last week. — Edgar Loya, Gonzaga University

People are not guaranteed rights because they are black or white. People are not guaranteed rights because they are women or men. People are not guaranteed rights because they are gay or straight. People are guaranteed rights because they are individuals, because they are people. — Nate Clemons, Spokane

Last legislative session I proudly voted for Senate Bill 5688 – ensuring that all Washington families would be treated equally under state law, with the same protections and the same obligations as their neighbors. — State Sen. Jeanne Kohl-Welles, Ballard

The Domestic Abuse Women’s Network provides services to survivors of domestic violence and their children.  DAWN has been providing culturally competent services to survivors in South King County since 1980.

Are we so overburdened with happiness in this world that we need to take special measures to increase the unhappiness of any two adults who find comfort living in each other’s company? Joy to the world, folks. Joy to the world. Vote yes on Referendum 71. — William Breitenbach, Tacoma

When the American colonies declared independence, they also declared that all are created equal. Despite those bold words, anyone who wasn’t male, white and a property owner was not truly equal. — Kristin Gogerty, Puyallup

I would like to comment on the wonderfully written, compassionate, thoughtful letter in the Oct. 25 edition by Judi Edwards about Referendum 71. — Beverly Smith, Port Orchard

A vote to approve Referendum 71 is a vote to keep the domestic partnership law in place. This law provides legal protections for lesbian and gay couples and for heterosexual couples where one partner is age 62 or older. This law allows for older people to gain legal benefits without jeopardizing Social Security or other economic benefits that would be adversely affected by marriage.

With more than 24 percent of the county’s ballots returned as of Thursday, Yakima County Auditor Corky Mattingly’s prediction of 53 percent voter participation in Tuesday’s election remains within reach.

I am stunned by the hypocrisy of the reject R-71 campaign. They say that domestic partnership is a weighty issue that should not be decided by courts or the legislature. It must be put to a vote of the people – the best determiner of law. — Janis Walworth, Bellingham

The Washington Bus, a two-year-old non-profit group dedicated to supporting and training young people to engage in state politics, is at it again this year — going door-to-door to request not your treats, but your votes.

How will you be voting on Referendum 71? Do you think that lesbian and gay couples in committed relationships should have the same rights and protections as heterosexual couples?

How will you be voting on Referendum 71? Do you think that lesbian and gay couples in committed relationships should have the same rights and protections as heterosexual couples?

The Protect Marriage Washington campaign has a video posted on its Web site that is so inaccurate it is funny. — Ty Stober, Vancouver

Please, give everyone the right to care for their loved ones. Please do not help to persecute those who have a different lifestyle. Please do not be afraid to bring about change. Fight for the freedom of all. — Elizabeth Carlson, Redmond

As we drive around Spokane, we see many signs to Reject Ref. 71. But I wonder, do people really know what they are rejecting? You are rejecting rights for normal families and their children. — Mary Layton, Spokane

First and foremost. I am a married mother of two children. With that said, I was driving home from work Saturday when I crossed over the Allen Street bridge to see a group of people. Protesters. Now, I realize that everyone has the wonderful right to do this; however, I was appalled at what they protested. — Mary Porter, Longview

Marisa Willis, Seattle Times’ fall letters editor, offers this sprightly appeal to voters age 18 to 30. Willis is a student journalist, soon to graduate from Western Washington University. “It’s not Obama, so I’m not voting,” is an assertion currently running rampant through the circles of 20-somethings in Seattle and the rest of King County.

Our state Legislature enacted new rights to a group who hadn’t had those rights before. However, a referendum was sought by those who thought the legislature was not upholding the current social mores. The year was 1889. The Legislature granted women the right to vote. Sadly, this right wasn’t upheld in a voter’s referendum. — Teresa Dominic, Olympia

Your vote to approve Referendum 71 is your statement that all families in Washington are to be treated equally and fairly. — Steering Committee, San Juan Island Chapter, ACLU of Washington

It was my partner of 26 years who helped me find the right word to describe the sensation we are both feeling: humiliation. For those fully integrated into society, it is difficult to imagine having both granted rights and the legitimacy of a committed relationship put up to a vote. — Daniel J Hinkley, Indianola

Tacoma City Council has weighed in on a hot-button measure on the state ballot this year, one putting rights for domestic partners up for a public vote. On Oct. 20 eight members voted for a resolution endorsing approval of Referendum 71, with Councilmember Mike Lonergan abstaining.

I was saddened to read the letter (SWR Oct 21) wherein W.F. of Clinton writes in opposition to R-71. No one is seeking special recognition or “subsidies” here; supporters of R-71 are seeking equal civil and human rights for our neighbors. — Hal Seligson, Langley

As parents of a gay son, we can provide reassurance to those who fear that approving Referendum 71 will lead to the “glorification” of an “addictive lifestyle” (letter, 10-24). — Gary Klauminzer and Eleanor Klauminzer, Gig Harbor

The fair and just vote on Referendum 71 would be for “approved.” The ballot measure affirms the rights and responsibilities of domestic partners as spelled out in SB 5688, passed in the 2009 legislative session by overwhelming majorities in both houses.

OPPONENTS of Referendum 71 are using more arm waving and fancy footwork than an aerobics class. Groups working against a sensible expansion of Washington’s domestic-partnership law are desperate to change the subject. They are inventing distractions.

All this time, I have been expecting Susan Hutchison to become the next King County executive. She may still accomplish that, but a new poll is suggests maybe not.

I am a lesbian living in Vancouver. I am the parent of two children, a grandparent and am “married” to my female partner. I work, go to church and love spending time with my family. The things I want in life are no different than any other parent, grandparent or married person. I want to take care of my family, and have the option for unpaid leave to take care of a critically ill partner. — Joslyn Baker, Vancouver

Opponents of stronger legal partnerships for gay couples must abide by Washington state’s campaign finance laws while a lawsuit challenging those laws’ constitutional footing moves ahead, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

As the mother of a happily married gay man (married in Canada to his longtime partner), I cannot see how the passage of Referendum 71 could possibly do any harm to happily married heterosexual couples. — Helen Holt, Lakewood

Stephen Colbert on Referendum 71 and the effort to make secret the names of those who signed the petitions.

Our founding fathers stated in the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” — Michael T. Barr, Sammamish

A year after Seattleites danced for their “Change” candidate, a Republican may take over the county, the state could vote anti-gay, and local governments could go broke.

Protecting individuals and their families is the most important reason for approving Referendum 71 in the upcoming election in Washington state.

The firestorm surrounding Referendum 71, which would keep the state’s everything-but-marriage law, is a two-pronged debate. There’s what the law does, and what might come next. We think voters should decide R-71 based on the first question.

The Approve 71 campaign today won an important victory in federal court when Federal District Court Judge Ronald Leighton turned down an effort by the Reject 71 campaign to eviscerate Washington’s voter-approved campaign finance laws.

For Immediate Release — Oct. 27, 2009

Federal judge denies Reject 71 campaign’s last minute attempt to gut state’s campaign finance disclosure law

SEATTLE – The Approve 71 campaign today won an important victory in federal court when Federal District Court Judge Ronald Leighton turned down an effort by the Reject 71 campaign to eviscerate Washington’s voter-approved campaign finance laws.

The Family Policy Institute of Washington created a new political action committee and filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order in an effort to have their affiliated national anti-gay organizations dump large amounts of money in the campaign at the last minute.

The emergency suit was an 11th hour assault on the state’s limit on contributions within the final three weeks of a campaign, as well as the requirement that campaigns disclose the identities of contributors. The organization filed its suit days before the November 3rd general election, and after many voters had already turned in their ballots.

In denying the Reject 71 campaign’s motion, the judge said “The State has a real and vital interest in showing the money trail…I do not believe it is in the public interest for the court to intervene and change the rules of the game at the last minute.”

Judge Leighton, who was appointed by former president George W. Bush, added, “I do not believe there is a real emergency. The constraints imposed upon the plaintiff are self-inflicted.”

“The Reject 71 campaign was trying to shield from public view the identities of donors, and to overturn the rules governing large contributions in the final days of the election,” said Anne Levinson, Approve 71 Campaign Chair. “The people of Washington adopted the Public Disclosure Law to ensure that financing of the political process is transparent, and that the government and political campaigns remain accountable.

“Voters have a right to know who is behind this attempt to repeal the domestic partnership law, trying to take away legal protections from gay and lesbian families. If Approve 71 had not intervened—if our opponents had their way—it would have gutted much of our state’s 35-year-old campaign disclosure law and all of the current elections could have seen an influx of anonymous, last minute contributions,” Levinson added.

The emergency suit was filed by Family PAC, a new political action committee formed to challenge the law and accept money from out of state special interests. It has the same board of directors and address as the Family Policy Institute of Washington, and its only contributor is the National Organization for Marriage (NOM). On the same day Family PAC filed its motion in Washington, NOM filed a nearly identical lawsuit in Maine, challenging the constitutionality of that state’s financial reporting requirements. NOM is also the single largest contributor to a pending ballot initiative in Maine, where they are trying to overturn Maine’s civil marriage equality law.

Washington state’s domestic partnership law provides critical legal protections for gay and lesbian families and seniors, especially in times of crisis. The Family Policy Institute of Washington, Protect Marriage Washington and a host of other socially conservative groups are trying to get voters to reject Referendum 71. Rejecting 71 would take away legal protections such as unpaid family sick leave as well as death benefits for a partner and children when a parent dies.

The Approve 71 campaign has received more than 5,600 contributions from contributors in 19 different counties. More than 4,500 contributions have been $100 or less.

“Our contributors have openly donated money and publicly endorsed the Approve 71 campaign. They have put their money and their names behind our campaign,” said Josh Friedes, Approve 71 campaign manager. “The public has a right to expect that both sides will play by the rules.”

###

Contact:
Sue Evans
253.592.1590

media@approve71.org

Josh Friedes
206.679.8546

media@approve71.org

Google has a reputation for actively participating in policy debates surrounding information access, technology and energy. However, we do not generally take positions on social, legal or political issues that arise beyond our normal, day-to-day business. With that said, there are issues that are so important and so clear cut that we feel compelled to lend our voice. Supporting Referendum 71 is one of those issues.
— Brian Bershad – Engineering and Site Director, Google Seattle
— Scott Silver – Engineering and Site Director, Google Kirkland

The time to vote is now. Last week, registered voters from around the state received a General Election voter ballot, and although this is an off-year election, the stakes for LGBT Washingtonians – and some seniors – have never been higher.

What happened to the Roman Empire? I am aware of very many attempts to answer this question. More than 200 years ago, Edward Gibbon memorably blamed the barbarians and the Christians for what he termed “the decline and fall of the Roman Empire.” My high school gym teacher blamed a lack of physical fitness among the Romans. But in decades of study, I have yet to see any serious scholar blame something called “the homosexual lifestyle.” — David Lupher, Tacoma

Why on Earth should I insist my government give me unearned privileges over another taxpaying citizen because I’m heterosexual? — Jeff Kerssen-Griep, Vancouver

The nation’s third party. We support equal rights for all people, all of the time.

We here at LHMI Productions- who present Hour Forum the longest running LGBT television program in the Pacific northwest are happy to announce that yes, we do support Referendum 71!

We have recently done total of three television programs- one hour long, about the referendum.
We are in this for the fight, the victory, and challenge that faces each of us.

While we see many in our community being bashed, treated as third class citizens, we here at LHMI Productions say  “enough”.

In 2007, Washington’s first domestic partnership law opened the door for domestic partners to have many of the same rights and obligations as spouses.

Referendum 71: Approve. The Bellevue Reporter recommends approving Referendum 71 to expand domestic partnership rights to gay and lesbian families as well as senior domestic partners.

Rallying outside the John Birch Society/Tea Party, I was reminded of the Rodgers and Hammerstein song, “You’ve Got To Be Carefully Taught.” — Mary Milam, Yakima

Supporters of Referendum 71– which would preserve the domestic partnership law for gays and lesbians — released an internal poll showing the measure leading slightly.

In 2007, Washington’s first domestic partnership law opened the door for domestic partners to have many of the same rights and obligations as spouses.

Washington voters should approve Referendum 71.

Starbucks added its name to the list of major Northwest employers who support referendum 71, which would uphold Washington law that extends marriage-like benefits to gay, lesbian and some senior couples.

ANY suggestion of voter confusion, real or not, favors opponents of Referendum 71, which seeks to expand rights for registered domestic partners and their families. Foes want it to seem a messy jumble.

I am curious as to why so many people are unaware that, beyond the gay issue, Referendum 71 is a benefit for unmarried heterosexual seniors, in that domestic partnerships mean that their hard-earned Social Security, military or pension benefits are not put at risk as they would be with a traditional marriage. — Ruth Sweeney, Spokane

As a religious minister, I urge the readers of the Bellevue Reporter to Approve Referendum 71 on the November ballot. Keep the Domestic Partnership Law. — Rev. Joan Montagnes, East Shore Unitarian Church, Bellevue

Don’t let procrastination steal your ballot; remember to vote in Nov. 3 election.

Referendum 71 is in no way a threat to families and children. In fact, the opposite is true. What is a threat to families and children is teaching intolerance and the lack of compassion. — Kristine Alskog Hall, Gig Harbor

Recent letters concerning Referendum 71 have made persuasive arguments as to why we should vote yes but have missed one key detail. The most compelling case to be made for R-71 and equal rights for same-sex couples is that there are no logical arguments against them. — Rod Whittaker, Shelton

Playing out in the opposite corner of the continental United States is a political campaign that would look very familiar to the voters of California.

The objectives of Local 27 set by our Constitution and Bylaws are, in part:

•  The fostering and encouragement of a higher degree of skill and efficiency in the fire service;
• The cultivation of friendship and fellowship among its members;
•  Also, the maintenance of proper remuneration for duty performed;
•  The elevation and improvement of the moral, intellectual, social, economic, health, and safety conditions of its members.

I have concerns about Larry S. Bowman Jr.’s Oct. 12 letter, “Where does this law lead to?” Referendum 71 isn’t about marriage, it’s about domestic partners. His letter rails against gay marriage, and yet I can remember a few years ago all the talk was about how people had no problems with equal rights, just don’t call it “marriage.” That’s exactly what R-71 is about: equal rights. — Larry Didier, Vancouver

As a globally recognized plant expert, Dan Hinkley once had us nurturing a marvelous exotic tree, the Dawn Redwood, which he carried home from a collecting trip to the wild west of China’s Sichuan province.

Opponents of Referendum 71 swerved off the road to victory onto the shoulder toward defeat this week.

I hear that there is a rumor being spread that if referendum 71 passes, my synagogue or church will be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies. That’s not true – not even remotely possible. — Rabbi Marti Leviel, Bellingham

Revisiting the music of Peter, Paul & Mary, on the passing of Mary Travers, one finds the chorus of her duet with Holly Near of Sally Fingerett’s “Home Is Where The Heart Is.” — Bob Findlay, Olympia

Election Day is still a little over a week away, but the voting is well under way.

Thurston County election workers say they expect voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election to be at least 60 percent, the highest for an odd-year election since 1999.

Referendum 71 is the civil rights issue of this generation and I am passionately committed to ensuring that all couples have the same rights and protections that I enjoy as a married person in this state. — Kim Glore, Bellingham

Will Washington state extend or roll back the civil rights of same-sex partners that were granted by the Legislature this year? That is the question Referendum 71 will ask voters in the Nov. 3 election.

I’m a married, heterosexual, Christian minister with eight grandchildren. I try to be a follower of Jesus, who said that we should care about the least, who challenged those in power and with special privileges, and who directed his ministry of love and acceptance to the less-privileged. Accordingly, I support Referendum 71. — Judi Edwards, Bremerton

While opposition to R-71 has been largely driven by religious conservatives, and much attention has been paid to their efforts, there are also many people of faith who support the referendum.

The Wenatchee World asked several local clergy to share their opinions on the referendum. Two agreed. Their positions — one to approve, one to reject — may help you decide how you’ll cast your vote.

I work every day with women and children fleeing domestic violence. My work at the YWCA has taught me that all that matters in a relationship is love. — Miriam Barnett, Gig Harbor

My partner, Kate Fleming, touched thousands of lives with her voice. With astonishing versatility and vivacity, she narrated more than 250 audiobooks as diverse as A Beautiful Mind, Bel Canto and A Tree Grows in Brooklyn.

The legislative bill related to Referendum Measure 71 passed in our state senate this year 30 to 18 and in our state house 62 to 35, but now, because of a citizens’ petition, it appears on our November ballot.

An Oct. 16 Associated Press article reports that a Louisiana judge still refuses to marry interracial couples. Astonishing, in this day and age? Apparently not, given that hundreds gathered in Yakima the previous evening to hear “Tea Party” speakers espousing much the same sort of bigotry. — Gina King, Yakima

Referendum Measure No. 71 – APPROVED
This bill would expand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations accorded state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners to be equivalent to those of married spouses, except that a domestic partnership is not a marriage.

As my own 43rd wedding anniversary approaches, I write to urge readers to vote “yes” on Referendum 71 in November. — Chris Lilly Backus, Bellingham

Will Washington state extend or roll back the civil rights of same-sex partners that were granted by the Legislature this year? That is the question Referendum 71 will ask voters in the Nov. 3 election.

King County has moved entirely to a Vote by Mail system. Watch this video to learn more about the system and what it means for you.

There is nothing as anti-American as legislation that takes civil rights away from law-abiding citizens.

I’m voting to approve Referendum 71 because I believe all families deserve to be treated equally and fairly under the law. This is about honoring family values for all types of families. — Laura Ellsworth, Vancouver

R-71 opponents are disingenuous at best. At worst, they are lying outright. — J. Matthew Phipps, Gig Harbor

Our ballots have begun to arrive in mailboxes all over our area, and at this critical time in our history, I ask all voters to consider carefully the significance of their vote, the meaning of the act of voting and the importance of considering the outcomes of this act. — Rev. Elizabeth “Kit” Ketcham, Minister, Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Whidbey Island

My partner and I of 18 years have lived in Gig Harbor since 1991. As I drive around the area, going to the Costco or the YMCA, I am seeing signs for the reject Referundum 71 campaign. That saddens me. — Rex Davison, Gig Harbor

It is by making good choices that the citizens of our towns, counties, state and country make their government work. Too bad so many — very nearly half by [Secretary of State Sam] Reed’s estimation — will not make any choice at all.

Any notion that domestic partners are demanding “special rights” is preposterous. The right to use family sick leave to care for one’s seriously ill domestic partner, or the right to the death benefits when one’s domestic partner is killed in the line of duty are examples of rights that other families already enjoy. — Dan Thane and Christopher Chow, Lummi Island

This week’s Q&A is with Anne Levinson, chair of the Approve Referendum 71 campaign. I talked to her about why she’s in favor of the referendum and some things she wants to clear up about it.

Homosexuality is not a choice. I know this because I am heterosexual, and am not at all attracted to people of my own sex. And I am not choosing to be that way. — Fred Godejohn, Seattle

In times of economic hardship, we should not impede the efforts of fellow citizens to care for their own. This is about equality and fairness, yes, but ultimately it is about the basic tenet of faith that you should treat others as you yourself would wish to be treated. — Cary Toland, Seattle

The Libertarian Party of Washington has endorsed the “Approve” Referendum 71 position.

The Olympia Food Co-op’s two stores offer a wide selection of local, organic, and natural foods and products. The co-op is member owned, collectively managed, and committed to being a community resource that practices and promotes nutritional awareness, local farming and production, environmental responsibility, and social and economic justice. Fresh, affordable, and local. Everyone is welcome!

Alki UCC is an Open & Affirming congregation located in the Alki beach area of West Seattle. Our purpose is “Growing together as disciples of Jesus Christ, courageously sharing God’s love with each other and the world.”

Kirkland Congregational Church is a United Church of Christ congregation. We are an Open and Affirming, progressively Christian church and a member of the Greater Kirkland Ecumenical Parish. No matter who you are, or where you are on life’s journey, you are welcome here.

I’ve recently become engaged to the love of my life. Unfortunately, as we are trying to celebrate our love and plan our wedding, our joy has been undercut by the struggle that our gay friends and family are fighting this November. — Kyle Robinson, Spokane

The annual Project Homeless Connect at the Tacoma Dome Exhibition Hall attracted about 1,600 homeless people, all from our local area (TNT, 10-15). Many came alone, and some arrived in small groups and families. — Colleen Waterhouse, Lakewood

I ask you to approve Referendum 71, which affirms the 2009 Domestic Partnership Bill. Why? It represents the fairness that is at the heart of American representative democracy. — Karen Frank, Port Townsend

As a pastor serving in local congregations in the Northwest for over 30 years, I often hear from people who are concerned about family values and strengthening the family. Members of religious communities and others who value strong families should vote “Yes” on Referendum 71. — Rev. John Rosenberg, Tumwater

IBEW Local 46 continues its proud tradition of quality craftsmanship, leadership in our community, excellent wages and benefits for members, and innovation in organizing the unrepresented.

Lesbian and gay people pay taxes without being allowed full legal rights. So much hard work and generously paid taxes while their families were not protected and their rights frequently denied with heart-breaking regularity. — Deborah Jordan, Tacoma

Karin Mitchell is on a diet. Well, she has to be, Mitchell says. She’s got a big event coming up. Mitchell and her partner are planning a commitment ceremony after living together in Mukilteo for nearly four years. They want to celebrate their love while ensuring they’ll have the same rights as a married couple under the law.

I am amused by the “Statement Against” Referendum 71 in the Voters’ Pamphlet. — Mike Kenyon, Auburn

Children are suffering because their parents do not have access to the same rights and legal avenues that straight parents are availed. — Cathy Campbell, Bellingham

Is fairness one of your values? Gay men and lesbians in Washington pay taxes like everyone else, but don’t get treated like everyone else. — Pat Fabiano, Bellingham

Chuck Miller confuses me regarding his “defense of marriage” in his Oct. 8 letter, “Protect marriage; vote ‘no’ on Ref. 71.” How can he defend marriage by refusing to let legal adults who love each other not have the same rights that he enjoys? — Shelby Kenoyer, Vancouver

Please help us keep the recent protections of domestic partnerships, such as family and medical leave, offered both gay and lesbian families and senior citizens by our state Legislature. — Kate Miller, Bellingham

Sixteen people took to the streets of Longview on Monday afternoon, calling for the approval of Referendum 71 to maintain the rights of same-sex couples with domestic partnerships.

Claire Fulenwider and Harriet Forman found their Vancouver dream house tucked into a forested bower in West Minnehaha one year ago.

As the vote on Referendum 71 approaches, a local Walla Walla couple hopes their story will be an example to fellow Washingtonians as to the importance of the legislation’s approval.

Skagit Valley Herald
http://www.goskagit.com/home/article/approving_r_71_only_fair_and_just_way_to_vote/

The Columbian
http://www.columbian.com/article/20091015/OPINION04/710159941/-1/OPINION

http://www.columbian.com/article/20090906/OPINION02/709069992

Walla Walla Union-Bulletin
http://www.union-bulletin.com/articles/2009/10/14/opinion/daily_editorial/091014editorial01ref71.txt

The Oregonian
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2009/10/referendum_71_would_hasten_pro.html

Federal Way Mirror
http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/south_king/fwm/opinion/64060927.html

The Western Front
http://westernfrontonline.net/2009100911387/frontline/frontline-create-equal-rights-for-domestic-partnerships/

The Spokesman-Review
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2009/oct/09/support-referendum-to-protect-rights-for-all/

The Olympian
http://www.theolympian.com/opinion/story/992484.html

Seattle Times
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2009990546_edit04ref71.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2009937576_edit25ref71.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2009865157_edit15vote.html
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2009786988_edit02fair.html

Chinook Observer
http://www.chinookobserver.com/Main.asp?SectionID=2&ArticleID=30460

Everett Herald
http://heraldnet.com/article/20090911/OPINION01/709119919/-1/OPINION#Reaffirm.law.for.fairness

Wenatchee World
http://www.wenatcheeworld.com/news/2009/oct/17/r-71-say-approved/

Yakima Herald-Republic
http://www.yakima-herald.com/stories/2009/10/18/referendum-71-it-s-about-rights-responsibilities-vote-yes

Edmonds Unitarian Universalist Church has been in Edmonds for over 50 years.
We are a welcoming and vibrant community engaged is social, spiritual, creative and intellectual pursuits in accordance with the seven principles of our UU organization.
We are lucky to have Rev. Charlotte Cowtan as our interim minister for the 2009-10 church year while we continue our search for a settled minister.

Our Church Board just voted to endorse Ref. 71 as a faith organization. Many many individual members already support the referendum.

GayLawNet® is dedicated to providing general information and resources concerning the law as it affects the global gay, lesbian, bisexual, transsexual and intersex (GLBTI) community and the simplest access to a gay or lesbian (or gay or lesbian-friendly) lawyer.

Washington Women Lawyers (“WWL”) is Washington State’s largest organization dedicated to furthering the full integration of women in the legal profession and promoting equal rights and opportunities for women and preventing discrimination against them.

Seattle’s first congregation, established in 1853, First Church is proud to support R-71. We urge passage of this referendum to provide full partnership rights for all Washington citizens.

An Open and Affirming congregation in the United Church of Christ, with GLBT members and staff and a long history of support.

As chair of the Advisory Council for the Southwest Washington Agency on Aging and Disabilities, I am particularly concerned about all matters that pertain to Washington’s senior citizens. — Maggie Culbertson, Battle Ground

American values: Equality. Freedom. Opportunity. Pursuit of happiness. E pluribus unum. Diversity. Unity. Thirteen states united into one. — Annie Russell, Gig Harbor

With the approach of the November election, opponents of Referendum 71 are citing everything from cultural tradition to religious and moral authority to explain their intention to vote against it – because it reaffirms the “everything but marriage” law recently passed by the state Legislature. — Garland Richmond, Bellingham

While heading into work on Friday, I saw a small group on the corner of Second Avenue and Lincoln Street waving signs in opposition to Referendum 71, which would give voter approval to the “everything but marriage” law that was adopted by the Legislature last spring. The law grants to registered same-sex couples the same rights and benefits accorded married couples under state statutes. Normally, I wouldn’t mind such a political display, but among those holding “Protect Children” placards were children themselves.

One side is fighting for what it believes are basic civil rights for gay and some elderly couples, and the other is fighting against what it sees as the degradation of morality and an eventual erosion the institution of marriage.

My partner of 18 years and I have lived in Gig Harbor since 1991. As I drive around the area, going to the Costco or the YMCA, I am seeing signs for the Reject Referendum 71 campaign. This saddens me. — Rex Davison, Gig Harbor

My husband and I would have supported the rights of domestic partners whether or not we had a child who is gay. But Daniel brings this issue of civil rights home.

Will Washington state extend or roll back the civil rights of same-sex partners that were granted by the Legislature this year? That is the question Referendum 71 asks voters in the Nov. 3 election.

Referendum 71 is the biggest civil rights issue placed in the hands of Washington voters since an anti-affirmative action measure reached the ballot a decade ago.

Referendum 71 shouldn’t be confusing. But it can get that way in a hurry.

Our Constitution clearly states that we are all created equal and yet here we are in 2009, once again voting on whether our gay citizens should have equal rights. It is appalling. — Ellen Lockert, Bainbridge Island

I’m writing in response to Steve Shay’s article about Ref. 71 earlier this week. I want to say that Referendum 71 is not “the latest assault to marriage” as he notes a member of the opposition stated, but rather it is just a continuation of rights that are already in place, rights that should belong to each member of any life-long committed relationship. — Lauren Myers, Tacoma

The other state ballot question asks voters whether or not Senate Bill 5688 — which expands rights for state-registered same-sex and senior domestic couples but does not consider them “married” — should remain on the books. …We endorse approval, and letting the will of our elected officials stand.

Today, The Olympian’s editorial board offers an unqualified endorsement of equal rights for same-sex domestic partners. We encourage voters to approve Referendum 71 on Nov. 3.

A few months ago, when this referendum was still in the signature-collecting stages, I came across an article comment that has stuck with me throughout this referendum process. I believe it encompasses exactly for what we are fighting. — Kara Gallemore, Fall City

Just last year, after living in Seattle for eight years, I returned to California. At that time, the battle of Proposition 8 was heating up. I returned to a state full of hatred and anger. It became open season on the gay community. — Karen Hedberg, Palm Springs, Calif.

I am a married, straight male. I know that two men or two women in a committed relationship to each other will not harm my marriage or anyone else’s marriage, either current or future. — Robert L. Stewart, Renton

As we come closer to the vote on Referendum 71, I start to think about the facts. — Chris Boone, Seattle

Those so-called religious leaders working to repeal the law securing partnership rights for all Washington citizens ought to spend a little less time preaching against gays and a little more time rereading the gospel message of the man they claim to follow. — Dan Murphy, Everett

The Reporter recommends approving Referendum 71, also on the Nov. 3 ballot, to expand domestic partnership rights to gay and lesbian families as well as senior domestic partners. Opponents of the legislation want to “protect” marriage, but in reality, the opponents only want to protect their own deeply-ingrained prejudices and fear of change.

Washington voters can help foster healthy communities by voting Nov. 3 to approve Referendum 71. Upholding the domestic partnership law will protect Washington families and show fairness to all citizens regardless of sexual orientation, while protecting our economy. — Kate Joncas and Lyn Tangen

We are a gay couple in a 16-year committed relationship. We raised a son together as full-time parents. We were active PTSA members and officers. We own and maintain a home together. In short we do all the things a ‘traditional’ family does. — Dan Jensen and Terry Williams, Scenic Heights (Charlestown)

“These people are saying mean things about us.” Our 11-year old son whispered these words to the rest of our family as we waited to testify in front of the Washington state House Judiciary Committee last February in support of the Domestic Partnership Expansion bill, the “Everything but Marriage” law.

We take exception to the premise that providing equal rights and protection under the law for gays and lesbians constitutes special rights. — Jerry and Sue Howson, Des Moines

Basic civil rights for all citizens of the state, including gay couples, are not special rights [“The leaders behind push to undo gay benefits,” page one, Oct. 14]. The law that Larry Stickney and Gary Randall are trying to overturn merely provides equal legal protection for all domestic partners who are currently denied the right to marry. — Michael Carr, Seattle

Re: “Don’t be swayed by guilt trip arguments” (letter, 10-9). The author wrote that he believes voters should not concern themselves with the arguments offered by either side of the issue. …When was it that ignorance became a basis upon which to vote? — Dean Uribe, Olympia

Initiative 1033 and Referendum 71 are insidious measures, in my opinion. In their own way they denigrate our lifestyle to the maximum degree if we vote the wrong way. — Adrienne Lederer, Bellingham

Thirty-one organizations that represent and serve communities of color have endorsed Referendum 71 and are urging to voters to APPROVE Referendum 71 to support the state’s Domestic Partnership Law passed by the legislature and signed by Gov. Gregoire earlier this year.

October 15, 2009
Seattle, WA
Contact: Gabriela Quintana
206-240-8250 (cell); gquintana@aclu-wa.org
Ref. 71 Community Organizer

Thirty-one organizations that represent and serve communities of color have endorsed Referendum 71and are urging to voters to APPROVE Referendum 71 to support the state’s Domestic Partnership Law passed by the legislature and signed by Gov. Gregoire earlier this year.

The new law provides the same state rights and responsibilities to registered domestic partners that are afforded to legally married couples. Unfortunately, these rights are at risk of repeal unless voters APPROVE Referendum 71 on this fall’s ballot. The law covers both lesbian and gay couples and heterosexual couples with one partner age 62 or older.

“There isn’t just one type of family in our communities. We are a diverse community, with diverse families. They all deserve legal protections and to be treated fairly under the law especially during these times of economic uncertainty,” said Estela Ortega, Executive Director of El Centro de la Raza.

The organizations support the Approve Referendum 71 campaign because gay and lesbian couples need domestic partnership laws to provide essential protections for their families. Committed couples who want to take care of each other should be allowed to visit each other in the hospital, take family and medical leave when a loved one is seriously ill, and have insurance coverage. Families with children need the protections provided by domestic partnership laws, especially when a parent dies. There are gay and lesbian couples in our community whose relationships are not recognized by their employers, leaving them uninsured or ineligible to receive survivor’s benefits if one of them passes away.

“This new law also protects elders in our community who are in monogamous opposite-sex relationships but choose not to marry. Our elders are the rock of our community. We must do all that we can to protect them,” said James Kelly, President of the Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle.

Often seniors who are widowed or divorced will suffer serious economic hardship if they remarry. Under Social Security, there is a “marriage penalty” which puts seniors’ benefits in peril if they remarry. The domestic partnership law allows unmarried senior couples to have the legal protections they need to take care of each other, to be able to provide insurance or take family or medical leave if a partner is gravely ill, and to make critical decisions for one another in times of crisis – without losing benefits that for many may be their only source of income. They should not have to live in poverty in order to be together with the person they love.

The Approve Referendum 71 campaign is being supported by the following groups and organizations of color:
· Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle
· El Centro de la Raza
· Asian and Pacific Islanders Coalition of King County
· Northwest Indian Bar Association
· Minority Executive Directors Coalition of King County
· Seattle-King County NAACP
· Middle Eastern Legal Association of Washington
· Entre Hermanos
· Organization of Chinese Americans of Greater Seattle
· Latino Political Action Committee of Washington
· Japanese American Citizens League
· Community 2 Community Development
· Loren Miller Bar Association
· Filipino Lawyers of Washington
· Asian Pacific Islander Community Leadership Foundation
· National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum
· Asian Pacific Directions Coalition
· Asian and Pacific Islander Women and Family Safety Center
· Vietnamese Bar Association of Washington
· Sea Mar Community Health Clinics
· Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance
· Raising Our Asian Pacific American Representation
· OneAmerica
· South Asian Bar Association of Washington
· Korean American Bar Association of Washington
· Latina/o Bar Association of Washington
· Pinay sa Seattle
· Sahngnoksoo
· New Americans Action Fund
· CASA Latina
· Asian Pacific Islanders Coalition of Pierce County

###

I find it shocking that in the United States, a country that has seen so much progress in civil rights, there is such a large group of people that will stop at nothing to deny the rights of same-sex couples. — Derek Held, Junior in Computer Science

The state law giving same-sex couples equal rights of a domestic partnership to married spouses is already here. SB 5688 was signed into law in May 2009. And nothing disastrous or devastating has happened. The sky hasn’t fallen. — Eva Luchini, Camas

For years now opponents to same sex relationships have been arguing that they are not in favor of calling domestic partnerships “marriages” but, that they do support rights for all families. Clearly they have been less than honest about their intent and ultimate goal. — Desi Saylors, Olympia

After listening to the no on Referendum 71 ads on radio, I am left wondering why its sponsors want us to vote no. — Jim Borah, Tacoma

A letter writer suggests we not be swayed by either side but to vote our “gut feeling” (TNT, 10-9). My gut feeling is that “all people are created equal” and perhaps should be treated that way. — Catherine North, Federal Way

With the November election approaching, some Whitman students are working hard to educate the campus about Referendum 71.

The state of civil rights in this country is an affront to everything we stand for. Gay American citizens are being denied basic rights to which they are constitutionally guaranteed, all because their sexual orientation denies them an official marriage.

The first thing voters need to know about Referendum 71 on the Nov. 3 ballot is precisely what question is being asked. Voters are being asked if they support Senate Bill 5688, which passed this year in the Legislature and expanded domestic partnerships. Voters are not being asked if they want to repeal that bill. Thus, if you approve of fairness and equality for domestic partners, vote “Approve.” We hope this will be your choice. The Columbian editorially applauded SB 5688 earlier this year.

We urge voters to approve Referendum 71, which keeps in place the state law that gives same-sex couples — those who do not have the option of marriage — essential protections and rights of married couples.

In 2007, the Oregon Legislature approved a strong domestic partnership law, granting gay and lesbian couples legal and economic protections roughly equivalent to those of marriage.

In addition to protecting gay families who are denied the right to marry, the domestic partnership law provides protection to older hetrosexual couples where one partner is at least 62 years of age. — Ian Anderson, RN, Greenwood

My wife and I are passionate about equality. We often remark on how sad and silly it would be if we had been born different genders. Our rights as a couple would be different in many parts of the country. Luckily, Washington already has a great domestic partnership law. Unluckily, it’s under threat this fall. — Nick Lesiecki, Ballard

Coming on the heels of a $100,000 donation last week from Microsoft, the company’s CEO, Steve Ballmer, and co-founder Bill Gates have each donated $25,000 to the campaign to retain the latest expansion of the state’s domestic partnership law.

Founded in 1989, Equity Foundation works to eradicate prejudice towards the sexual and gender minority communities of Oregon. By working with organizations and philanthropic donors, we are able to fund change and change attitudes through granting and scholarship opportunities.

The Pierce County Human Services Coalition is a consortium of nonprofit organizations that work in the human services field. From food banks to dispute resolution, the Human Services Coalition members work together to strengthen services for low-income people in our community.

Evergreen Unitarian Universalist Fellowship is a community of 170 members in Marysville, WA. Our foremost principles are: the inherent worth and dignity of every person; and justice, equity, and compassion for all persons. With a unanimous vote of our congregational meeting on Oct. 11, we affirm as a congregation entire Ref. 71 and the rights of Domestic Partners. We are a Welcoming Congregation, meaning that we warmly and gladly include gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons in our community. Learn more about us at www/evergreenuu.org.

Cascade RainBow Center is a grass roots effort by people both gay and straight and bi in Skagit County Washington to enforce all our equal rights that now we still do not have. While we are in love or partnered we want to be married someday. When our loved ones are told because they are L,G,B,T,Q, they cannot participate in a group, sect, or Religious assembly we want to be there to Love them in our community as a Support and Resource at the Center.

Founded in 1888, the Medical Society’s mission is to support its members in delivering the best care, to champion the public welfare and to promote the highest ideals of medical practice.

The Mission of the Washington State Association for Justice is to protect and promote a fair justice system and the right to trial by jury, and to ensure that any person who is harmed by the misconduct or negligence of others can obtain justice in America’s courtrooms, even in actions against the most powerful interests.

Casa Latina’s mission is to empower Latino immigrants through educational and economic opportunities.

Our vision is that the Latino community participate fully in the economy and democracy of this country.

We are located in Monroe, Washington and we are an “Open and Affirming” church,a community of God’s people, joined in a spiritual journey,encouraging discussion, sharing thoughts and ideals. We welcome people from varied traditions and value each one’s gifts. Our church has unanimously voted to adopt a resolution to support the approval of Referendum 71 and is committed to making that public in our community.

Families Like Ours (FLO) is the premier national independent, nonprofit 501(c)3 Adoption Exchange. We welcome the diversity of all pre and post adoptive-foster families so they can be permanent families for children in the US foster care system.

There’s nothing frightening about this law. Nor is it complex. It’s a simple endorsement of equal treatment for all Washington residents, especially in times of need.

It seems a little ironic that people who left their own country because of religious persecution feel free to persecute others in this country because of their sexual orientation. — Maggie Hart, Lake Forest Park

Some of the same folks who likely emigrated from Russia to escape state-sanctioned oppression and curtailment of basic human rights, and to enjoy the American promise of tolerance and freedom, are working hard to ensure those benefits are withheld from a substantial portion of Americans. — Faren Bachelis, Shoreline

As Slavic evangelicals take to the streets with their signs to reject R-71, I have one request: Think. — Teresa Dix, Mount Vernon

It was disheartening to read The Seattle Times article of the several hundred demonstrators who descended on Lynnwood to protest Referendum 71…Is there any difference between a dictator and a religious group telling people how they should live their lives? — Louise Nadeau, Lake Forest Park

Saltwater Church is a Unitarian Universalist congregation located in Des Moines, Washington and serving all South King County. It is officially a Welcoming Congregation and has taken a congregational vote to promote marriage equality in Washington State.

Dignity/Seattle is a local chapter of DignityUSA and is a faith community of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender Catholics, our families and friends in Seattle since 1973. We provide a safe environment for people to reconcile our God-given gifts of sexual orientation and our Catholic faith through gay-affirming liturgies. Being part of the Dignity/Seattle family means claiming ownership of our faith and living up to the responsibilities of that ownership. We celebrate the wholeness and holiness of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Catholics.

While West Seattle voters learn more about Seattle’s two mayoral candidates, Mike McGinn and Joe Mallahan, some area politicians and activists say the bigger struggle is informing the public about the statewide Referendum 71, or R-71, which will also be on the Nov. 3 general election ballot.

The Mirror recommends approving Referendum 71 to expand domestic partnership rights to gay and lesbian families as well as senior domestic partners.

A recent letter writer urges us to feel no guilt in voting to reject Referendum 71 (TNT, 10-9). We should ignore centuries of human progress, basing our vote on a primitive urge rather than making a thoughtful, informed decision that acknowledges our collective human dignity. — Rudolph Henry, Tacoma

There was a time in our nation when it was acceptable to force your wife to have sex, when blacks were lower than whites and when women were considered second-class citizens. Children were promised to others for marriage, and molestation was a problem kept quiet. However, our culture has evolved with time. — Sais Singh, Sumner

In a fairly unsurprising session, City Council members passed resolutions opposing a government revenue-restricting initiative from Tim Eyman and backing a domestic partnership law.

A small crowd of UW students gathered outside Schmitz Hall yesterday en route to Volunteer Park and, eventually, the courthouse. They carried signs that read: “We’re Here 4 Queer” and “Straight But Not Narrow.”

If you don’t think a loved one deserves hospital visitation rights…

Imagine you get a call at work and you learn that a member of your family has been in a severe car accident or diagnosed with a terrible disease. It may take months for this family member to recover. Or, perhaps, they have been given only a few weeks to live. And you have no family medical leave you can take without the risk of losing your job.

More than 1,000 people turned out Sunday for a rally in downtown Seattle to support Referendum 71, which would uphold Washington’s “Everything But Marriage” law. *Editor’s note: WAFST works to preserve the law for all domestic partners, including heterosexual couples.

Referendum 71 must be approved for fairness and justice. We have always had reactionary citizens who think they know what is best for others. In earlier times, those who persecuted others as witches in the name of God destroyed lives and spread nothing but fear in their misguided attempts to be pious. — Carol Patterson, Vancouver

City Council members will consider resolutions that address a state election initiative and a referendum during a Monday, Oct. 12, meeting. One is a resolution offered up by Councilwoman Barbara Ryan that would have the council supporting an approval of state Referendum 71, which would enact a domestic partnership bill nicknamed the “everything but marriage” law.

By this time next week, Washingtonians will have received their ballots asking whether or not they want to keep the state’s domestic partnership law, which grants the same rights and responsibilities for registered same-sex domestic partners and some seniors as married couples.

The scenario that gay-rights advocates had feared may be coming true. Vote Reject R-71, a political action committee, registered with the state’s Public Disclosure Commission yesterday to campaign against Referendum 71, thereby attempting to repeal the state’s domestic-partnership law.

Re: “R-71 would help protect Washington’s families – like mine” (Viewpoint, 10-8). We found it both humorous and troubling that our dear friend Laurie Jinkins had a such a touching Viewpoint article about her and Laura’s family on the same day that you reported about the Baptist minister who was making obscene phone calls to a nearby coffee shop. — Linda Shaffer & Walt Waisath, Jr., Tacoma

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 49th Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 44th Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 43rd Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 42nd Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 41st Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 30th Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 23rd Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 21st Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 22nd Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 11th Legislative District.

The Democratic Party organization of Washington’s 2nd Legislative District.

Born and raised in Clark County as a fourth-generation Washingtonian, I was brought up to treat people fairly. Not everyone will be as successful or happy as everyone else, but everyone should have the same opportunities. It is for this reason that I support Referendum 71 to preserve rights for state-registered domestic partners.

Listening to the high holy talk coming from the opponents of Referendum 71, one might assume God will unleash swarms of locusts upon Washington state if the domestic partnership law is upheld by voters.

“IT’S nothing personal.” They are the three most dishonest and disorienting words anyone has ever told me. I heard them three years ago in the wake of a tragedy that changed my life forever. Hearing them again in connection with Referendum 71, which puts the rights and protections of thousands of Washington families at risk, compels me to respond.

Come Nov. 3, people in this state will have a chance to decide whether to be fair or not to others who do not have the same set of circumstances they do. Thanks to a group of people who are threatened by this proposition, the law on domestic partnerships is now before the voting public in Referendum 71.

The state of Washington needs to recognize the rights of domestic partners so their partners and children can be fully protected in case something goes wrong. The protections and rights of a marriage need to be available to everyone, not just those who fit into a specific, traditional formula.

The Domestic Partnership law is about equality for every resident of Washington and it is NOT marriage. The legislators that we voted into office approved an expansion of benefits earlier this year—Senate Bill 5688. Now a small group of individuals want to overturn this and deny basic rights to same-sex couples and heterosexual couples over the age of 62. To vote to deny these rights is a slap in the face to thousands of Washingtonians who are your friends, family neighbors, classmates and professors. — Nick Milhoan, Western junior, Chair of Bellingham Pride Festival

Sea Mar Community Health Centers is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health and human services to diverse communities, specializing in service to Latinos.

From the ballot box to the classroom, the dedicated workers, organizers, and leaders who forged this great organization and maintain its status as a champion of social justice, fought long and hard to ensure that the voices of African Americans would be heard. For nearly one hundred years, it has been the talent and tenacity of NAACP members that has saved lives and changed many negative aspects of American society.

The Vietnamese American Bar Association of Washington (”VABAW”) was formed in 2005. Our goal is to provide mutual support for attorneys in the advancement of their careers, be a trusted guide and resource for students who aspire towards the legal profession, serve as a voice for the local Vietnamese American community, and represent Vietnamese American attorneys within the State Bar. Our current membership includes practicing attorneys from Seattle, greater King county, and Snohomish county.

The Rainier Valley Unitarian Universalist Congregation, a lay-led group which meets at 12th and Warren each Sunday at 10:30 AM, welcomes and celebrates the presence and participation of transgender, gay, lesbian and bisexual people. Our Social Justice committee works to inform, organize and transform our members, our community and our world towards justice, peace and freedom for all.

Evangelical Christian Brent Childers explains his journey from believing that homosexuality was an abomination to marching in a pro-gay march on Washington.

I have read several articles that discuss the pros, cons and the processes for Referendum 71 on the Nov. 3 general election ballot. …I will tell you that based on what I have read and understand, I am in favor of the referendum because I believe it is right to ensure that state-registered domestic partners are fully recognized under Washington law.

Listening to the opponents of Referendum 71, you’d think the Washington state Legislature had either outlawed marriage, made it legal for same-sex couples or advocated the burning of Bibles. None of those things happened when Senate Bill 5688, or the “everything but marriage” law, was adopted last spring.

As religious leaders of West Seattle, we have come together to speak with one voice for all families. Religious leaders before us have spoken to end slavery, and to ensure equal rights to all persons regardless of gender, nationality, religion, and race. Today, we feel compelled to speak out in support of Washington’s domestic partnership law, which provides essential protections to families throughout the state. 
 

Rev. Kendall Baker, Retired, United Church of Christ
Rev. Peg Boyle Morgan, Westside Unitarian Universalist Congregation
Rev. Dr. Joanne Carlson Brown, Tibbetts Methodist Church
Rev. Diane Darling, Alki Congregational United Church of Christ
Rev. Ann J. Eidson, Admiral Congregational Church
Rev. David Kratz, Fauntleroy United Church of Christ Church
Rabbi Anson Laytner, Congregation Kol HaNeshamah
Rev. Mark Newton, Westside Unitarian Universalist Congregation
Rev. Paul Winterstein, Calvary Lutheran Church

Religious conservatives have put together their first video ads against Referendum 71’s expansion of rights for registered domestic partners in Washington.

East Shore Unitarian Church is a Welcoming Congregation. We are a caring, religious community inspired by our Unitarian Universalist heritage. We grow souls and bring peace and justice to our lives and our world.

Wallingford United Methodist Church is a dynamic progressive faith community in the Wallingford neighborhood of Seattle. A pioneer in the Reconciling Movement, Wallingford UMC has been welcoming and advocating for the rights of LGBT persons for over 25 years.

The Northwest Indian Bar Association (NIBA) is a non-profit organization comprised of Indian attorneys and judges in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington, and in spirit in British Columbia and the Yukon Territory, which aspires to improve the legal and political landscape for the Pacific Northwest Indian Country. The purposes and goals of NIBA are:

• To represent and foster the education and welfare of Native American attorneys, paralegals and tribal court personnel of the Pacific Northwest
• To provide role models and mentors in the legal profession for Indian people, particularly Native American youth and law students
• To encourage and promote pro bono legal work and civic involvement that benefits Indian people on reservations and in urban areas throughout the Pacific Northwest.

About the Filipino Lawyers of Washington. The Filipino Lawyers of Washington is a professional association of lawyers in the Filipino community dedicated to fostering the exchange of ideas and information among and between its members and other members of the legal profession, the judiciary and the community; promoting the professional growth of its members; assisting in efforts to diversify the legal profession; cooperating with other organizations of minority attorneys; celebrating Filipino culture; and providing a vehicle and forum for the expression of opinions and positions about current social, political, economic, legal or other matters or events that concern the members of the association.

The Loren Miller Bar Association, originally formed in Seattle in 1968, is at its core a civil rights organization, focused on addressing the issues of race, and social and economic disparities that affect the African-American community. The Loren Miller Bar Association’s history reflects the birth, growth, maturation and success of the African-American legal community, and its commitment to access to justice, within the State of Washington.

I never wanted to be a poster child for anything. But now I’m becoming one for the sake of my own family and thousands of others in Washington who do not enjoy equal protection under the law.

Stuart and John. I’ve never known one without the other.

As YWCA Clark County’s executive director, I ask Washington voters to please vote “yes” on Referendum 71. Your vote preserves the domestic partnership law that has already been passed by our state legislature and signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire. This law expands the rights of registered gay and lesbian domestic partnerships. It also applies to heterosexual partnerships when one partner is at least 62. — Kathy Kniep, Vancouver

Our country was founded on the equality of all men and women. Why should that change based upon the sexuality of the individuals? — Kim Driscoll, Bellevue

For the life of me, I fail to understand how gay marriage could be a threat to traditional marriage. — C. Wight Reade, Seattle

The Times Sunday front-page headline “Stakes high in fight over gay rights” is only partially correct. The stakes are certainly high for the gay and lesbian community. If Referendum 71 is defeated, they lose an opportunity to gain the dignity, happiness and peace of mind that the rest of us take for granted. — David G. Gardner, Seattle

Microsoft Corp. has donated $100,000 to Washington Families Standing Together, the campaign seeking through Referendum 71 to retain the latest expansion of the state’s domestic partnership law, up for a public vote on Nov. 3.

I am writing in support of Referendum 71, and asking my fellow community members to vote to approve the expanded domestic partner rights in Washington state. – Brian Griffith, Pasco

If Referendum 71 isn’t approved, it will be a major step in the wrong direction for all Washington families. All of us should be treated equally and fairly under the law. Approve Referendum 71. — Sarah Hinton, Bellingham

I choose to think voting to approve R-71 is not only granting equal civil and human rights to our fellow citizens, but is a moral act of respect and love. I recall from my days in Sunday school, of the three important elements in a person’s character, “the greatest of these is love.” I plan to acknowledge that precept by voting to approve R-71. — Robert J. Dietz, Bremerton

Much of the debate over legalizing gay marriage has focused on God and Scripture, the Constitution and equal protection. But we see the world through the prism of money. And for years, we’ve heard from gay couples about all the extra health, legal and other costs they bear. So we set out to determine what they were and to come up with a round number — a couple’s lifetime cost of being gay.

We are an Open & Affirming Congregation. Suquamish UCC promotes personal development and spiritual awakening to serve justice and compassion in our communities. We welcome and accept into worship, participation in church life, full membership and leadership, and are affirming to members of groups that continue to suffer injustice for reasons that may include sexual orientation, race, gender, ethnic background, age, marital status, physical ability, and developmental differences.

Absentee College Democrats of King County are run by and for absentee voters of King County who are currently enrolled in college and post-secondary study. We have established a national network of college students resident to King County and provide them with ballot information, registration information, and absentee resources.

The letter by Hal Seligson in Saturday’s paper really gives all the right reasons for supporting Washington families. However, his call to action was contrary. For the Domestic Partnership Law to remain intact we must vote to APPROVE Referendum 71. — Grethe Cammermeyer, Langley

Freely Speaking Toastmasters is “open to everyone” and is created by and for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Community of the Seattle area, and enhances the opportunities of Toastmasters International by providing an open environment that is professional, affirming, and fun.

OUT for Sustainability brings the LGBTQ together with social and environmental sustainability, connecting macro issues with individual choices and impact, through partner led events, education, consulting and advocacy.

The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) is dedicated to promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.

 Representing nearly 40,000 public employees, the Washington Federation of State Employees  (WFSE/AFSCME Cncl 28) is a vital, changing and growing organization.

WFSE/AFSCME is the largest union representing state agency and higher education employees in Washington. Our members include Community Corrections officers, direct-care workers, clerical workers, children’s services workers, environmental engineers, custodial workers, park rangers, highway maintenance employees, workplace safety employees, IT specialists, forensic scientists and many other positions dedicated to making our state a great place to live.

MISSION…The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages the informed and active participation of citizens in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Religious conservatives are telling voters that Referendum 71 is the last chance to stop those who would legalize gay marriage, while their opponents try to keep the debate focused on domestic partnerships — something that to many voters is still unfamiliar.

Today, The Olympian’s editorial board offers an unqualified endorsement of equal rights for same-sex domestic partners. We encourage voters to approve Referendum 71 on Nov. 3.

In this colorful Special Section, find articles on the status of the campaign and campaign happenings; what you can do to help Approve Ref. 71; and messages of active support and solidarity from our community, clergy, elected officials, candidates and businesses.

The Washington state labor movement plans to devote significant resources to winning approval for Referendum 71.

10th L.D. District Dem’s organization is the group of PCO’s and other interested Democrats who live in the 10th L.D. We have quarterly meetings for everyone to attend with speakers and programs. We have Exec. Board meetings once a month between our sites of Skagit, Snohomish, and Island Counties-taking turns hosting the quarterly meetings. Anyone may attend Exec. Board meetings, but only officers may vote then. Everyone may vote at quarterly meetings. Our main goal is to get Democrats elected to the State Legislature. Our secondary goal is to support and help get elected National and County Democrats. Important issues are studied, discussed and voted on.

This is the official organization of the Democratic party in Island County. The governing body is our Central Committee which is the elected Precinct Committee Officers and their elected officers.

As an open and affirming congregation, the members and staff of Fauntleroy Church in West Seattle are committed to fostering community among people of all races, cultures and sexual orientations.

Our goal is to ensure that every individual has the information, services, and freedom to make healthy, responsible decisions about sex, sexuality, and parenthood.

SECURING fundamental fairness for all Washington families requires voter approval of Referendum 71 on the November ballot. The Seattle Times strongly endorses voter passage of legislation to expand rights for registered domestic partners. The law, already adopted by the state Legislature and signed by Gov. Chris Gregoire, takes effect after a majority of voters mark “Approved.”

Why do seniors need the protection of domestic partnerships?

Often seniors who are widowed or divorced will suffer serious economic hardship if they re-marry.

Print the PDF
Print the Chinese translation of this handout.

Print the Spanish translation of this handout.

Steve Doty and Linda Dunbar are a senior–citizen couple. They live in North Seattle and they’ve been together a long time. They’ve seen each other through her breast cancer and his Parkinson’s Disease. But they’re not married. Steve and Linda would be directly affected by Referendum 71. It’s a measure that’s going to be on the Washington state ballot November 3.

If Referendum 71 isn’t approved, it will be a major step in the wrong direction for all Washington families. All of us should be treated equally and fairly under the law. Approve Referendum 71. — Mark Lee, Kennewick

Thurston County Democrats have weighed in formally with several local races this fall. …Thurston County Democrats, as well as the 22nd Legislative Democrats, voted to support the ‘Yes on Approve 71′ referendum, and reject Initiative 1033.

I’m constantly amazed by the letters to the editor. While everyone should be able to voice their opinion, the lack of logic is sometimes astounding. — William R. Marsh, Vancouver

We are more than 22,000 health care workers across Washington State united for quality patient care and good careers in the health care facilities and agencies where we work.

We are a union ­— an independent organization created by employees to advocate for our common interests.

We believe that health care works best when health care employees have a strong voice in decision-making. We stand together to make sure that our pay and benefits allow every employee’s family to live a decent life.

I love Edmonds. I have lived here for over 40 years and the last 20 with my life-partner. We own our home, and we have great neighbors, two dogs and a cat. — Melissa Barran and Jo Ann Hartline, Edmonds

This November, voters could deny basic rights to thousands of Washington State residents. If Referendum 71 does not pass, thousands of same-sex couples in Washington will be denied the right to domestic partnerships.